Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Officer concerned: PC Niko Mawany
Dates of hearing: 29 to 30 June 2026
The brief circumstances are that the Officer posted an offensive poll, intended as a joke, in a WhatsApp group, doing so recklessly having regard to its potential to cause offence. The poll in fact caused upset to the complainant. Further, the Officer's conduct by trivialising an important aspect of the Muslim faith risked reputational harm to the police service. Considering these factors the panel assessed the level of harm caused by the Officer's conduct to be medium.
The Officer's conduct was, as already found by the panel, reckless. He ought to have foreseen the risk of causing offence before making his posting, particularly given his awareness of the policies governing the use of social media. Considering these factors the panel assessed the level of the Officer's culpability to be medium.
The panel identified the Officer's deviation from policy as an aggravating factor.
In respect of mitigating factors, the panel identified that:
The panel also took into account the personal mitigation advanced on the Officer's behalf, including the considerable evidence of his good character from his colleagues and the confidence they placed in him.
The panel considered the available outcomes, starting with the least severe sanction. Having regard to the seriousness of the misconduct, the aggravating and mitigating factors, and the purpose of the police misconduct regime, the panel was satisfied that an 18-month Written Warning was an appropriate and proportionate outcome.