Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Website maintenance notice: Due to scheduled platform maintenance, form submissions will be unavailable between 11.55pm on Tuesday, 8 September and 7am on Wednesday, 9 September. The rest of the website will continue to function normally. Please return after 7am on 9 September if you wish to submit an online report.
Officer concerned: Former DC James Quigley
Dates of hearing: 18 to 19 August 2026
Former DC Quigley faced the following allegations:
Allegation 1: It was alleged that on 19 February 2024, the officer entered the locker room at Bromley Police Station and stole items from a colleague's locker, namely two packets of crisps and a weapons tube containing approximately £20-£30 in cash and several pin badges. This conduct was alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour relating to Honesty and Integrity and Discreditable Conduct.
Allegation 2: It was alleged that on 20 February 2024, the officer was found at his home address in possession of two Metropolitan Police Service Level 2 batons without proper authority or justification. This conduct was alleged to have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour relating to 'Discreditable Conduct' and 'Duties and Responsibilities'.
The Panel of the proceedings, determined that Allegation 1 was proven at the level of Gross Misconduct and the former officer would have been dismissed if still serving.
Allegation 2 was proven at the level of Misconduct and that the Standards of Professional Behaviour had been breached. As the officer is no longer serving, no further disciplinary sanction was imposed in respect of this allegation.
The Panel of the proceedings determined that Allegation 1 was proven at the level of Gross Misconduct and the former officer would have been dismissed if still serving.
Allegation 2 was proven at the level of Misconduct and that the Standards of Professional Behaviour had been breached. As the officer is no longer serving, no further disciplinary sanction was imposed in respect of this allegation.