Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
We’re aware of an issue affecting the address finder on some forms. This is linked to a problem with an external service, which may mean you’re unable to complete your report or application at the moment. We’re monitoring the situation closely and will provide updates as soon as possible. Please try again later. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Officer concerned: PC Nassar Khan
Dates of hearing: 2 to 6 February 2026
Police Constable Nassar Khan answered allegations that his conduct amounted to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour, in respect of:
On 13 March 2024 hospital staff contacted officers regarding concerns about a patient who was on life support there. PC Khan and a colleague attended the hospital, but it was alleged that they left without having conducted sufficient enquiries or taken appropriate and necessary investigative and safeguarding actions.
Such inaction by the officers thereafter left that patient with her partner, about whom concerns had been raised by the hospital as to him interfering with her life support system, the officers also being made aware of a history of domestic abuse by him towards her.
It was further alleged that the officers failed to provide to their supervisors a complete or accurate account of what had occurred at the hospital and thereafter.
The panel found that PC Khan was not diligent in the exercise of his duties and responsibilities in respect of the incidents pertaining to allegations 1 and 2. His actions fell far short of those expected and required of a competent serving Police Constable of the Metropolitan Police Service.
The panel acknowledged that PC Khan admitted the core allegations before them and has demonstrated some, but not full, insight. The panel found that there was some mitigation in this case.
In the light of all of these factors, the panel concluded that the appropriate and proportionate outcome in this case was a final written warning for a period of 2 years.