Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Freedom of information request reference no: 01.FOI.24.037087
I note you seek access to the following information:
Please could you provide information in relation to facial recognition deployments.
I have today decided to disclose some of the requested information. Some data has been withheld as it is exempt from disclosure and therefore this response serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) by virtue of the following exemptions:
Section 31(1)(a)&(b) Law Enforcement
Reason for decision
The information requested for question 5 which requests the number of officers/staff deployed at each deployment is not suitable for open publication as it would be harmful to policing operations as it goes to identifying how many officers/staff are typically used in an LFR deployment which would have a serious impact on our ability to enforce the law. Therefore, we have applied the exemption provided under Section 31 of the Act (Law Enforcement) to your request.
Disclosure of the number of officers/staff deployed at each deployment would be likely to cause harm to the MPS as it would disrupt our core functions by informing those with the inclination to cause us harm the numbers of police/staff used in a typical LFR deployment. Subsequently harm would then be likely to occur in respect of individuals who would be more likely to become a victim of crime if our systems/processes were disrupted and this would also have implications for the wider community and other organisations we work with (including other police forces and the Crown Prosecution Service).
The release of this information could compromise the MPS’s law enforcement capabilities and the effectiveness of the force will be reduced. It could undermine current and/or future strategies when carrying out investigations and gathering evidence may be compromised. The personal safety of individuals is of paramount importance to the Police Service and must be considered in response of every release. A disclosure under Freedom of Information is a release to the world and, in this case, confirmation of the number of officers/staff deployed at each deployment would negatively impact the work of the MPS.
Law Enforcement is reliant on community engagement, intelligence and evidence gathering and when it is appropriate, information is given to the public. What has been established in this case is the fact that the release of information relating to the number of officers/staff deployed at each deployment would be harmful and have an adverse effect on the investigative process and on the public prevention or detection of crime and the apprehension or prosecution of offenders. This places the victims of such offending at a greater risk towards their health and wellbeing and is not an action the Police Service would be willing to take. These negatives outweigh any tangible community benefit and therefore the balance does not favour a confirmation or denial statement at this time.
Disclosure
For Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 – this is all in the public domain, please see below links:
LFR Deployment Grid (met.police.uk) 2020 to 2022
LFR Deployment Grid (met.police.uk) 2023 to date
For Q5 – we do not hold this information in regards to the costs as these operations are part of a wider policing operation and therefore it is not collated.