Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Freedom of information request reference no: 01.FOI.23.028283
I note you seek access to the following information:
Please could you provide me with the outcomes for each arrest? This is in reference to the table titled "arrests for loitering/soliciting by month" in the document titled Data for release v.3.
I'd rather you listed the outcomes for each arrest (e.g. June 2020, NFA; June 2020, charged etc) but if that's not possible, please provide me with a list of outcomes and the number of times they were used.
I have today decided to disclose the located information to you in full.
Please find below information pursuant to your request above.
Out of the 39 recorded arrests, 30 people were charged and 9 people were cautioned.
During this period, a review of the policing of sex workers was conducted and the policing approach on the borough moved from enforcement to safeguarding. Enforcement is now only conducted if there are concerns about safeguarding, confirming ID of sex workers or continuous practices subject to residential complaints after being warned by both police and the outreach team.
Please note, a breakdown by month would attract the same exemption as cited in your previous response (section 40(2)(3A)(a)), for the same reasons.