Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Freedom of information request reference no: 01.FOI.23.028204
I note you seek access to the following information:
In the last 5 years, what percentage of police officers that have been arrested or investigated for Gross Misconduct have been subject to no case to answer/ NFA?
What percentage of these figures have resulted in an officer losing their job?
I have today decided to disclose the located information to you in full.
Please find below information pursuant to your request above.
In the last 5 years, what percentage of police officers that have been arrested or investigated for Gross Misconduct have been subject to no case to answer/ NFA?
15% (187) of 1271 officer allegations resulted in ‘no action’. Of the 15%, 25% (46) were arrested while the remainder (141) were gross misconduct allegations. Please note that an officer allegation is an interpretation of who did what at the incident. Officers are counted against each allegation made against them (i.e. the number of allegations on a case, multiplied by the officers involved).
What percentage of these figures have resulted in an officer losing their job?
36% (178) of 499 officers were dismissed. Of the 36%, 41% (73) were arrested, while the remainder (105) were gross misconduct. A further 24% (122) of officers received the outcome ‘would have been dismissed’ following a misconduct hearing. Of the 24%, 37% (45) were arrested, while the remainder (77) were gross misconduct.
DUTY TO ADVISE AND ASSIST
Under Section 16 of the Act, there is a duty to advise and assist those that have made, or intend to make, a request for information. In accordance with this duty, I can confirm that the MPS publishes all disclosures made to requests received under the Act on its website. I have provided a link to this information below.
MPS Publication Scheme
The MPS Publication Scheme can be searched using keywords. This website may accordingly hold further information that is of interest to you.
Maintaining Public Trust in the MPS
Securing and maintaining the trust of the community is integral to the principle of policing by consent and to continue to do so, the MPS recognises that its staff must act with professionalism and integrity. The MPS treats each occasion when an allegation is made about the conduct of its staff extremely seriously and will fully investigate each incident to determine whether the conduct of that member of staff has breached the standards of professional behaviour. Where the conduct of staff is proven to have fallen below the standards of behaviour expected, the MPS will take robust action to ensure that its staff are held to account and that lessons are learnt from each case. Any instance where the conduct of our staff is alleged to have fallen below the standards of behaviour expected is treated extremely seriously by the MPS.