Data for incidents of revenge porn from January 2015 to July 2022

Freedom of information request reference no: 01.FOI.22.027313

I note you seek access to the following information:

NEW REQUEST:
1. Number of reports of revenge porn made each year since 2015, including the age of the victims.

2. Result of these reports - how many reported offences resulted in the alleged perpetrator being charged, cautioned or handed a community resolution?

Data broken down by each year. So e.g. 2015, 2016 etc.

PREVIOUS REQUEST 01/FOI/22/026216:
> Number of reports of revenge porn made each year since 2015, including the age of the victims.
> Result of these reports - how many reported offences resulted in the alleged perpetrator being charged, cautioned or handed a community resolution?
> Number of times Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and TikTok are named in a report for revenge porn each year since 2015?

Decision

I have today decided to disclose some of the requested information. Some data has been withheld as it is exempt from disclosure and therefore this response serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) by virtue of the following exemptions:

Section 40 - Personal Information

Reason for decision

Section 40 - Personal Information - Section 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018 confirms that information which relates to an identified or identifiable living individual is Personal Data. The Freedom of Information Act provides an exemption for Personal Data and this is known as the section 40 exemption.

The information sought under your Freedom of Information request includes the following which we consider to be Personal Data. I have applied this exemption in the:
Number of reports of revenge porn made each year since 2015, including the age of the victims.

Result of these reports - how many reported offences resulted in the alleged perpetrator being charged, cautioned or handed a community resolution?

Data broken down by each year.
I have applied this exemption in that the data returned low figures that could identify individuals,

If this occurs due to the information provided by the MPS, constitutes personal data, which would be in breach of the rights provided by the DPA.
Where the request is seeking access to third party personal data the section 40(2) exemption may be engaged.

In order to apply the Section 40(2) exemption the disclosure of the requested information must satisfy either the first, second or third conditions as defined by subsections 3A, 3B and 4A of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (as amended by Section 58 of the Data Protection Act 2018).

The first condition ensures that the exemption would apply in circumstances where the disclosure of the information would breach any of the Data Protection Act 2018 principles.

There are six Data Protection principles set out in the 2018 act and these can be found at section 34.

In this instance I have decided that the disclosure of the Personal Data would be incompatible with the first Data Protection principle which states that the processing (in this case the disclosure) of the data must be both lawful and fair.

Disclosure

Disclosure will reduce the harm when the age of the victims for each year are presented in an age range category, as the data returned low figures that could identify individuals.

Please find attached spreadsheet below.