Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Freedom of information request reference no: 01.FOI.21.022428
I note you seek access to the following information:
NEW REQUEST:
I'd like to kindly submit a request under the Freedom of Information Act, rephrased to the wording recommended by the MPS in response to 01/FOI/21/022306.
Please provide information for offence outcome for Attempted Murder with the outcome that was entered on the CRIS record, subject to any exemptions that may apply, over the last three calendar years. If that would exceed the statutory cost limit, please narrow the time period to this year.
Thank you very much.
I have today decided to disclose some of the requested information. Some data has been withheld as it is exempt from disclosure and therefore this response serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) by virtue of the following exemptions:
Section 40(2) – Personal Information
Reason for decision
Before I explain the reasons for the decisions I have made in relation to your request, I thought that it would be helpful if I outline the parameters set out by the Act within which a request for information can be answered. The Act creates a statutory right of access to information held by public authorities. A public authority in receipt of a request must, if permitted, confirm if the requested information is held by that public authority and, if so, then communicate that information to the applicant.
The right of access to information is not without exception and is subject to a number of exemptions which are designed to enable public authorities to withhold information that is not suitable for release. Importantly, the Act is designed to place information into the public domain, that is, once access to information is granted to one person under the Act, it is then considered public information and must be communicated to any individual should a request be received.
Details of an investigation could cause an individual to be identified and is therefore exempted in this case.
Section 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018 confirms that information which relates to an identified or identifiable living individual is Personal Data.
The Freedom of Information Act provides an exemption for Personal Data and this is known as the section 40 exemption.
Some of the information sought under your Freedom of Information request includes the following which we consider to be Personal Data
• Low numbers of offences that could if disclosed identify an individual.
Where the request is seeking access to third party personal data the section 40(2) exemption may be engaged.
In order to apply the Section 40(2) exemption the disclosure of the requested information must satisfy either the first, second or third conditions as defined by subsections 3A, 3B and 4A of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (as amended by Section 58 of the Data Protection Act 2018).
The first condition ensures that the exemption would apply in circumstances where the disclosure of the information would breach any of the Data Protection Act 2018 principles. There are six Data Protection principles set out in the 2018 act and these can be found at section 34.
In this instance I have decided that the disclosure of the Personal Data would be incompatible with the first Data Protection principle which states that the processing (in this case the disclosure) of the data must be both lawful and fair.
Disclosure
The harm of disclosure is reduced by redacting the low numbers. Please find attached a spreadsheet.
Table titled - Number of attempted murder offence with outcome across the MPS - Recorded Between 01/01/2019 to 31/12/2021.
The offender has died (all offences) 2019 and 2020 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.
Prosecution prev. - suspect ill 2020 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.
Evidential difficulties victim based 2020 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.
Susp id; V supports; evidential difficulties 2021 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.
Invest. complete: no susp id 2021 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.
Charge/Summons Alternate offence 2019 data has been redacted due to low numbers of people that could if disclosed lead to an individual being identified.